The time is now: the Senate must act on crypto market structure legislation
The United States needs to finally establish a clear framework that the market needs.
By Summer Mersinger, Ji Hun Kim|Edited by Betsy FarberUpdated May 6, 2026, 5:26 p.m. Published May 6, 2026, 5:25 p.m. 3 min readMake preferred on
Nine months ago, Congress passed the GENIUS Act, establishing the first federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. The results have been demonstrative: the stablecoin market grew 49% in 2025, reaching $306 billion by year's end. Circle, Ripple and other digital asset companies received provisional national banking charters from the OCC. Institutional capital that had been sitting on the sidelines moved into these markets. Recruiters, who a year earlier described an industry in which "every protocol foundation was bailing to the Caymans [tradingview.com]," now report that 90% of senior crypto leadership searches are U.S.-based. Clear rules produced exactly what their advocates said they would: investment, institutional engagement and onshoring of activity that had been migrating elsewhere.
That outcome sharpens the task before the Senate Banking Committee: applying a clear framework to the broader digital asset market. The crypto market is currently worth $3.2 trillion. Nearly 70 million Americans, one in five, own crypto. This is a significant and growing market.
The GENIUS Act addressed payment stablecoins. The CLARITY Act sets the rules for everything else: registration and oversight of trading venues and intermediaries, jurisdictional lines between the SEC and CFTC, disclosure and compliance across the token lifecycle, and the protection of non-custodial technologies under U.S. law.
These are the foundational rules that determine whether the next generation of financial infrastructure gets built here in America – or elsewhere. Within the last 10 years, the number of developers in the U.S. dropped by 51%. Nearly 90% of global CEX volume is offshore. America needs foundational rules because without them, the same dynamic that preceded GENIUS would apply to the rest of the market. Trading activity, protocol development and institutional engagement in digital asset markets will continue to flow toward jurisdictions that have already provided the regulatory clarity Congress has yet to deliver. Other jurisdictions, including the EU, Singapore, and the UAE, have already enacted market structure regimes and are providing the regulatory clarity yet to be delivered.
The Senate Banking Committee, alongside offices on both sides of the aisle, has spent the better part of two years building toward this moment. Senators Tillis and Alsobrooks deserve credit for resolving the stablecoin yield question in a bipartisan manner, the single most contested provision in months of negotiations. The compromise substantially expands the scope of the prohibition framework in GENIUS across digital asset market participants. The digital assets industry made significant concessions. The resulting approach is restrictive in several respects – ultimately, the broader and most critical objective remains advancing comprehensive market structure legislation, and this agreement moves that process forward.
Nothing is perfect in this process, and legislating is complex, but it’s a result reached through the kind of sustained bipartisan engagement that serious legislation requires. Chairman Scott has managed a difficult process across deep disagreements between the banking industry and the digital asset sector, and the Committee is closer to a durable outcome than it has been at any point in that process.
The window to act is narrow. The legislative calendar leaves limited time to move a bill of this scope through committee, floor consideration and final passage. A markup in the near term is necessary to keep this effort on track and ensure there is a viable path to the President’s desk before year-end.
The CLARITY Act passed the House with 294 votes. That breadth of bipartisan support reflects genuine congressional judgment that clear rules for digital asset markets serve the public interest. The Banking Committee should schedule a markup as soon as possible. The case for moving forward has never been stronger.
The United States should finally establish the clear, durable, fit-for-purpose framework this market – and this country – needs. America has long led the world because it has embraced innovation, markets and the rule of law. Now is the time to do so again.
Note: The views expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinDesk, Inc. or its owners and affiliates.
More For You
The legal risks and practical considerations of digital asset blacklisting
By Galen Kast, Emma Howard|Edited by Betsy Farber2 hours ago
When digital assets are frozen, holders can suddenly be deprived of access to their legitimate assets or income. Here’s what to know to keep your digital holdings safe.
Read full storyLatest Crypto News
Bermuda pushes stablecoin payments with USDC airdrop as it courts crypto firms, regulators
44 minutes ago
Crypto bill won't move without a ban on officials' industry ties, says U.S. Senator Gillibrand
52 minutes ago
The end of ads: Coinbase engineer says AI agents could kill the internet’s favorite business model
1 hour ago
Kevin O’Leary says Wall Street’s tokenization boom is all talk without crypto rules
1 hour ago
Crypto Long & Short: In quiet crypto markets, yield is the trade
2 hours ago
The legal risks and practical considerations of digital asset blacklisting
2 hours agoTop Stories
Bullish’s Equiniti deal could remake it into a tokenization powerhouse, Clear Street says
5 hours ago
Bitcoin moves above $82,000 while ZEC and DASH post double-digit rallies
7 hours ago
Morgan Stanley brings crypto trading with lower fees than rivals
5 hours ago
Consensus Miami Day 2: Real-time coverage and highlights from on the ground
3 hours ago
Crypto derivatives have converged with Wall Street. Equity perps could soon prove it.
10 hours ago