XRP adjacent Flare proposes protocol-level MEV capture and 40% inflation cut
The proposal would move block building away from individual validators, create a revenue entity called FIRE to buy and burn FLR, and reduce annual token inflation to 3%.
By Shaurya Malwa|Edited by Sheldon RebackUpdated Apr 10, 2026, 9:36 a.m. Published Apr 10, 2026, 9:04 a.m. Make preferred on
What to know:
- Flare proposed a governance overhaul to capture maximal extractable value (MEV) at the protocol level and redirect it from external searchers and builders to the network itself.
- The plan introduces a three-stage redesign of block building and a new Flare Income Reinvestment Entity (FIRE) to channel MEV and other protocol revenues into FLR buybacks and token burns, while cutting annual inflation to 3%.
- The proposal would sharply increase the base gas fee and boost annual token burns, even as typical transactions remain under a cent.
Flare published a governance proposal on Thursday that would make it one of the first layer-1 blockchains to capture maximal extractable value (MEV) at the protocol level rather than letting it flow to the small number of specialized actors who profit from transaction ordering across virtually every major chain.
MEV is the revenue that block builders extract by reordering, inserting or censoring transactions within a block. On most blockchains, this value flows to external searchers and builders who effectively impose a hidden tax on ordinary users through front-running, sandwich attacks and arbitrage.
External estimates put annual MEV revenues at tens of millions on networks like Arbitrum, upwards of $500 million on Ethereum, and as much as $1 billion on Solana. Flare's three-stage proposal would route the revenue into the protocol's own token economics.
In the first stage, block building moves from individual validators to a designated builder, initially run by the Flare Entity, with a fallback to the current model if the builder is unavailable. In the second, block building moves into Flare Confidential Compute, making the process publicly auditable. The third stage merges the builder and proposer into a single entity, shifting existing validators to a verification role.
The proposal also creates FIRE, the Flare Income Reinvestment Entity to collect revenue from multiple protocol sources including attestation fees, FAsset and Smart Account fees, confidential compute fees and the captured MEV. FIRE's primary mandate is reducing FLR token supply through open-market buybacks and burns.
Several changes would take effect immediately after approval. Annual FLR inflation would drop to 3% from 5%, with the hard cap cut to 3 billion tokens per year from 5 billion. A 20-fold increase to the base gas fee, from 60 gwei to 1,200 gwei, would raise estimated annual FLR burn from roughly 7.5 million to 300 million at current transaction volumes. Even after the increase, a standard Flare transaction would cost a fraction of a cent.
Flare has deep roots in the XRP ecosystem, having distributed its initial token supply through an airdrop to XRP holders in 2023. Its FAssets system, which has produced over 150 million FXRP, is designed to bring smart contract functionality to assets on blockchains like XRPL that do not natively support it.
The network reports over $160 million in total value locked as of late March 2026, with more than 887,000 active addresses.
More For You
Encryption Supremacy: Zcash and Privacy in the Age of Scale
By CoinDesk ResearchMar 31, 2026
Commissioned byGenZcash
Most crypto privacy models weaken as blockchain data grows. Encryption-based models like Zcash strengthen. CoinDesk Research maps the five privacy approaches and examines the widening gap.
Why it matters:
As blockchain adoption scales, the metadata available to machine learning models scales with it. Obfuscation-based privacy approaches are structurally degrading as a result. This report provides a comprehensive comparison of all five major crypto privacy architectures and a framework for evaluating which models remain durable as AI capabilities improve.
View Full ReportMore For You
XRP may be less exposed to quantum computer threats than bitcoin, experts say
By Omkar Godbole|Edited by Shaurya Malwa3 hours ago
XRP’s design leaves a smaller share of its supply exposed to future quantum attacks than Bitcoin’s, experts said, pointing to additional XRPL features that stand out.
What to know:
- Experts say XRP’s design leaves a smaller share of its supply exposed to future quantum attacks than Bitcoin’s, largely because of how public keys are revealed on each network.
- XRP’s built-in key-rotation and escrow time-lock features offer additional defenses that bitcoin lacks natively.

HSBC and Standard Chartered-led group land Hong Kong’s first stablecoin licenses
41 minutes ago
David Bailey’s bitcoin holder Nakamoto is trying to stay on Nasdaq with a reverse stock split
1 hour ago
Japan moves to classify cryptocurrencies as financial products
1 hour ago
XRP may be less exposed to quantum computer threats than bitcoin, experts say
3 hours ago
XRP edges higher to $1.35 on breakout, but bullish momentum still lacks
4 hours ago
ETH, SOL, DOGE slide as Bitcoin fails to break $73,000 for the third time since the ceasefire
5 hours agoTop Stories
Trump's World Liberty Financial uses 5 billion WLFI to borrow $75 million from a platform its advisor co-founded
19 hours ago
Quantum-safe bitcoin now possible without a soft fork, but costs $200 a pop, new research shows
6 hours ago
Kalshi now controls 89% of the U.S. prediction market as regulated trading takes over
15 hours ago
Mythos AI threat prompts Bessent, Powell to convene bank CEOs for urgent talks
7 hours ago