Nick Pell: Parapsychology struggles for scientific legitimacy, the flawed nature of ESP research, and the Cold War’s influence on psychic programs | Jordan Harbinger

Cold War pressures led the US to fund controversial psychic research despite lacking reliable evidence.

Listen on The Jordan Harbinger Show

Share

Add us on Google by Editorial Team Apr. 10, 2026

Key takeaways

• Parapsychology struggles for legitimacy within the scientific community.
• Studies in parapsychology often face criticism and skepticism.
• ESP research lacks reliable replication and is often considered flawed.
• Personal biases can significantly impact scientific research outcomes.
• The Stargate project consolidated various military intelligence programs.
• The project was officially recognized in 1991.
• Soviet claims of psychic program success lack hard evidence.
• Soviet bureaucracy often denied reality, even during crises.
• Remote viewing is essentially a rebranding of clairvoyance.
• The US funded remote viewing research due to Cold War pressures.
• The American government was willing to invest in unconventional research methods.
• Historical context is crucial in understanding psychic research motivations.
• The competitive nature of US-Soviet relations influenced research funding.

Guest intro

Nick Pell is a writer and researcher who serves as co-host of The Jordan Harbinger Show’s Skeptical Sunday segment, where he investigates pseudoscience and debunks common misconceptions. He has extensively researched government programs like Project Stargate and early parapsychology experiments, examining why seemingly credible scientific efforts failed to produce reliable evidence for phenomena like remote viewing and extrasensory perception. His work focuses on separating fact from fiction in areas where science intersects with popular belief.

The challenges of parapsychology

• Parapsychology attempts to study phenomena like ESP but faces legitimacy issues.

• Parapsychology is like psychic stuff okay so it’s like bullshit… the field is very small slash nonexistent basically.

  — Nick Pell

• The field struggles to gain acceptance in mainstream science.
• Studies supporting ESP are often not released due to fear of criticism.

• He gets some results that support the notion of extrasensory perception or ESP… he really doesn’t wanna release them to the broader scientific community because he knows they’re gonna be seen as weird and inherently flawed.

  — Nick Pell

• The tension between scientific rigor and controversial studies is significant.
• Public perception and potential biases influence research findings.
• Parapsychology’s controversial nature affects its scientific credibility.

The flaws in ESP research

• Ryan’s studies on ESP lack reliable replication and are considered flawed.

• None of Ryan’s other studies have been reliably replicated so for those of you playing at home his studies are junk and it’s not for lack of trying or people actively trying to sabotage his legacy people tried extremely hard to replicate his studies and they came up short.

  — Nick Pell

• Replicability is crucial for scientific credibility.
• Ryan’s flawed methodology may have compromised his scientific rigor.

• He’s a serious scientist but he’s kinda not a very good one… he has a really bad methodology and possibly because he was just bad at science possibly because he really wants ESP to be real.

  — Nick Pell

• Personal biases can affect research outcomes.
• The desire for ESP to be real may influence scientific integrity.
• Scientific methodology is critical in evaluating research findings.

The Stargate project and psychic research

• The Stargate project was a consolidated military intelligence program.

• Stargate project was actually the name of the consolidated project originally it was a whole bunch of different military intelligence programs with fanciful names like gondalawish grill flame centerlane sunstreak scangate and stargate.

  — Nick Pell

• The project aimed to explore psychic abilities.
• It was officially recognized and consolidated in 1991.

• They eventually all got lumped together into an official government project when was that man you’re gonna think this is nuts 1991.

  — Nick Pell

• Understanding the historical context of military research is important.
• The project reflects a structured approach to unconventional methods.
• The Cold War influenced the exploration of psychic phenomena.

Soviet claims and the reality of psychic programs

• The Soviets claimed to have results from their psychic programs.

• The soviets definitely said a lot of things but there’s no hard evidence that they ever got any kind of real results from this; there were a lot of anecdotes but very little in the way of repeatable experiments.

  — Nick Pell

• There is no hard evidence to support these claims.
• The Cold War context influenced the competition between the US and Soviet Union.
• The lack of scientific backing highlights the skepticism around Soviet claims.
• Anecdotes were prevalent, but repeatable experiments were scarce.
• The validity of Soviet psychic program claims is questionable.
• The geopolitical dynamics of the Cold War shaped research narratives.

The impact of Soviet bureaucracy

• Soviet bureaucracy exemplified a denial of reality during crises.

• They’re looking at an exploded reactor and being like that didn’t explode because soviet reactors don’t explode case closed yep case closed reality disagrees with the bureaucratic forum that I’m looking at so reality must be wrong.

  — Nick Pell

• Denial can lead to disastrous outcomes.
• Historical context is crucial in understanding Soviet decision-making.
• Bureaucratic systems often ignored reality in favor of ideology.
• The impact of denial on crisis management is significant.
• Soviet bureaucracy’s flaws are evident in historical events.
• The intersection of ideology and reality shaped Soviet policy.

Remote viewing and its scientific framing

• Remote viewing is essentially a rebranding of clairvoyance.

• I think we can fairly say that remote viewing is just a way of framing clairvoyance in a more sciency way in the middle of the twentieth century.

  — Nick Pell

• The terminology aimed to legitimize psychic phenomena.
• Historical context influenced the perception of psychic research.
• The mid-20th century saw efforts to frame psychic abilities scientifically.
• The rebranding reflects attempts to gain scientific acceptance.
• Understanding the framing of psychic phenomena is important.
• The legitimacy of remote viewing remains controversial.

US funding of remote viewing research

• The American government funded remote viewing research during the Cold War.

• It simply mattered that the Americans believed that they were having success with it… the American government is absolutely fine with using taxpayer dollars to fund American remote viewing research if there’s even a small possibility that they can get it to work.

  — Nick Pell

• The belief in Soviet success influenced US research funding.
• The competitive nature of US-Soviet relations shaped research priorities.
• Government investment in unconventional methods was significant.
• The Cold War context drove funding decisions for psychic research.
• The rationale behind funding reflects geopolitical dynamics.
• The American government’s willingness to invest highlights strategic motivations.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.