Start now →

Ethereum: Forward Industries dumps 8200 ETH at loss – $1,800 holds IF…

By Evans Boto · Published February 25, 2026 · 4 min read · Source: AMBCrypto
Ethereum
Ethereum: Forward Industries dumps 8200 ETH at loss – $1,800 holds IF…
Ethereum

Ethereum: Forward Industries dumps 8200 ETH at loss – $1,800 holds IF…

3min Read

Ethereum approaches a decisive structural inflection as price compresses near critical $1,800 support.

Posted: February 26, 2026 Avatar By: Evans Boto Journalist Edited By: Renuka Tahelyani Ethereum [ETH] Avatar Evans Boto Journalist Edited By: Renuka Tahelyani Posted: February 26, 2026 Share this article

A wallet linked to Forward Industries transferred 8,200 ETH worth $14.91 million to Coinbase on the 25th of February.

Source: X

The address had held the assets for nearly three years. On-chain data showed the entity realized a $10.82 million loss.

Previously, the wallet accumulated 23,491 ETH worth $76.26 million from Binance and Coinbase. Most of it was staked before redistribution.

That shift set up a fresh supply entering a centralized exchange rather than cold storage.

When long-term holders distribute at a loss, confidence often weakens. This transaction arrived at a technically sensitive stage for Ethereum [ETH].

Can Ethereum defend $1,800 inside descending channel?

Ethereum continued trading inside a clearly defined long-term descending channel.

Price had already lost the $2,122 horizontal level and remained capped beneath the falling upper boundary. At press time, ETH traded near $1,889, with the lower channel boundary converging toward $1,800.

That convergence concentrated pressure directly at support. However, buyers had not reclaimed broken resistance.

A decisive close below $1,800 could expose deeper liquidity pockets.

On the other hand, sustained defense of this zone might trigger a relief rotation toward prior breakdown levels.

Structure currently dictates that volatility expansion remains the dominant probability. The 14-day RSI stood near 33.39 after dipping into oversold territory.

That stabilization reflected cooling downside acceleration, not confirmed strength.

Importantly, no clear bullish divergence had formed against the price.

Ethereum price action

Source: TradingView

Shorts dominate liquidations across exchanges

Total Liquidations reached $37.65 million on the short side compared to $6.6 million in longs at press time.

Binance recorded $2.83 million in shorts versus $1.75 million in longs. Hyperliquid showed $2.23M in shorts against just $152.53K in longs.

Bybit, Gate, and Bitget also reflected elevated short exposure.

That imbalance suggested traders positioned heavily for downside continuation. However, crowded short positioning introduced squeeze risk if the price stabilized above $1,800.

When liquidation asymmetry builds, volatility often accelerates quickly.

Source: CoinGlass

Ethereum funding turns positive despite weakness

At press time, the OI-Weighted Funding Rate turned positive at +0.0050%. That shift occurred while the price hovered near structural support.

This shift indicates that leveraged participants have started paying to maintain long exposure. 

Notably, funding had previously printed deep negative spikes before gradually recovering. Such normalization often reflects early dip-buying attempts rather than broad conviction. 

However, positive funding during structural weakness can also expose long positions to vulnerability if support fails. When funding rises while price remains suppressed, the market enters a fragile equilibrium. 

Thus, Derivatives positioning now suggests cautious optimism rather than full risk appetite, leaving ETH sensitive to sharp directional moves.

Source: CoinGlass

Capitulation or controlled compression?

Ethereum stood at a decisive structural threshold where behavior mattered more than indicators.

If $1,800 held and intraday levels are reclaimed, short exposure could unwind aggressively. That unwind could fuel a relief expansion toward higher channel resistance.

By contrast, failure to defend support would likely accelerate directional continuation.

Leverage positioning amplified both breakdown and rebound potential. The structure favored movement over stagnation.


Final Summary

Next: Why OM trading is paused: Inside MANTRA’s rebrand, coin upgrade, and exchange suspensions Share Avatar Evans Boto Evans Boto is a crypto-fundamental analyst and journalist at AMBCrypto, specializing in evaluating the intrinsic value and long-term viability of digital assets. He analyzes protocol utility, tokenomics, and on-chain data to cut through market hype and deliver research-driven insights on blockchain, DeFi, and emerging fintech trends. More Articles
This article was originally published on AMBCrypto and is republished here under RSS syndication for informational purposes. All rights and intellectual property remain with the original author. If you are the author and wish to have this article removed, please contact us at [email protected].

NexaPay — Accept Card Payments, Receive Crypto

No KYC · Instant Settlement · Visa, Mastercard, Apple Pay, Google Pay

Get Started →